Getting the Best Los Angeles DUI Attorneys for Your Case

Los Angeles DUI attorneys specialize in the providing the best defense for your DUI case. Everyone makes mistakes -- it's just part of life. For a few of us, one of those mistakes is being arrested for DUI.

Los Angeles DUI attorneys say that your DUI ordeal will start when you are pulled over for how you are driving, or you are stopped at a sobriety checkpoint. At this time, you will submit to field sobriety tests administered by the police officer. DUI attorneys recommend that you should always be cooperative with the police officers, but unfortunately, some of the methods for the tests can be unreliable. This can be due to poorly maintained machines or improper training, etc.

Many attorneys agree that even though the methods can be unreliable, the reason they strongly suggest being cooperative and non-combative is because to refuse any of these field sobriety tests could mean more severe consequences.

If you do find yourself in trouble with the law, contact your attorney immediately. Besides the fact that you are going to want legal representation as soon as possible, your Los Angeles DUI attorneys can make sure everything is done properly. For instance, outside of the legal case, you only have 10 days to file for a special hearing with the department of motor vehicles to try to keep your license.

According to some attorneys, the police don't always give this information to you at the time of your arrest or release. If you don't file for this hearing with the DMV, you may automatically have a four-month suspension of your driver's license. This is a good reason why you need good Los Angeles DUI attorneys that are very knowledgeable in California DUI law.

Contact Los Angeles DUI attorneys Gold and Witham at WeDoDUI.com to see how they can help you. They each have over 20 years experience practicing law and they have devoted their practice to dealing exclusively with DUI cases.

Gold & Witham are experienced Los Angeles DUI Attorneys who provide the expert assistance necessary for anyone charged with a DUI. To learn more, visit http://www.wedodui.com or call (877) We Do DUI (877-933-6384).

amp d mobile

What Attorneys Do To Cops In Court

Why are we trying to learn to get admissions and/or confessions from suspects, anyway?

We desire such evidence to present at trial, or to build such an overwhelming case that the case doesn't even go to trial in the first place.

If that is indeed the goal, let's take a quick look at what we may encounter in a typical criminal trial.

In my years as a law enforcement officer, I've had the occasion to watch many attorneys conduct themselves in civil and criminal courts.

In fact, the average police officer spends much more time in front of a judge and/or jury than most attorneys.

Many attorneys have told me that trials represent a failure on their part to successfully plea-bargain a case, so they don't actually get to trial often.

In my conversations with many top-notch criminal defense attorneys, certain things are always emphasized in the representation of any criminal client.

In the pre-trial "game plan", the attorneys sketch out a plan of attack, basically as follows:

Attack the reason for the contact - if attorneys can establish that there were no grounds or authority for the initial contact, this will result in the exclusion of evidence.

How do they commonly establish the lack of grounds or authority?

One way is to dispute the officer's testimony concerning his/her initial observations which led to the contact, usually by implying that the officer is lying or embellishing.

An absolute counter to this is to obtain an admission from the suspect of the observed behavior which prompted the contact.

Attack the Officer's Conduct - coercion, force, fear, intimidation (either actual or implied) will always be ready avenues for defense exploration.

It's important to note that criminal defense attorneys may attack not only the officer's conduct during a particular contact, but they may use the officer's past history in an attempt to establish a pattern of past misconduct.

We have to think back no further than the well-publicized O.J. Simpson trial in which Mr. Simpson's attorneys discredited a police investigator by bringing up racially disparaging comments made by the investigator years prior to the Simpson prosecution.

Attack the decision to initiate action - if not successful in attacking the officer's reasons for the initial contact or the officer's conduct, most defense attorneys will move to attack the officer's decision to take action against the defendant.

Lack of reasonable suspicion and/or probable cause will be bandied about at this stage of the defense.

Evidence issues - if unsuccessful in the above arenas, most attorneys will move to the evidence itself and the chain-of-custody issues surrounding that evidence.

If the evidence gets excluded, most trials cannot be prosecuted.

If all else fails, now's the time for the classic S.O.D.D.I. defense:

"Some other dude did it."

Try the fast growing law enforcement interviewing method, http://www.focusedinterview.com for all your interviewing needs!

mortgage loan Asp Cheap Hosting

Santa Barbara DUI Attorneys & Santa Barbara DUI Attorneys Cross Exam 2

DUI Santa Barbara DUI California Cross Examination by Attorney Okorie Okorocha Part 1DUI DWI OUI: How to Cross Examine a DUI Police Officer by DUI Expert Attorney Okorie Okorocha, Esq. www.187Law.com



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4W0Yq18ehIU&hl=en

donating vehicles credit card information personal injury lawyer